Skip to main content

Media Literacy #1 - answers

1. She is trying to portray to her followers and anyone who happens to look at her page that she is adventurous, a free spirit, a traveler, curious about life, and an explorer.

2. She is mildly successful. To one who is absentmindedly looking at her page, the photos of her traveling and doing cool things would make one believe that she is a traveler. But to me, she looks a little fake. By fake, I mean these photos could have been staged. Many influencers ensure that their social media feeds are "vintage" and aesthetic-looking, but like you said in the beginning, this is an idealized version of what her life is actually like. Maybe she travels a lot, but the idealized photos that she posts are likely not her reality.

3. Not to become a conspiracy theorist, but I would not trust this woman with anything of mine. I do not want to ever be near her, if she even exists! The internet is a wild place. She could be a catfish, or a bot. Her bio caption stands out to me because no personal details are revealed, and real people love to talk about themselves. I can't even see her damn face! The fact that she doesn't show her own face, the fact that she doesn't follow anyone, and the fact that her photos and bio caption are really vague and don't showcase anything specific about her (For example, if she's a writer, maybe she'd be promoting a new book she's proud of writing, or if she's a traveler, she'd highlight the places she's been, or maybe even reveal her real name... her last name isn't Wanderlust) proves to me that she is probably fake in some way. A made up personality, likely a catfish or a bot.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Narrative Project

"Lost in a world" - Response

1. What is the general premise of the video? This video was intended to showcase how bad Western society has become in our addiction to mobile devices! We're overlooking key points in our lives to say LOL on our phones! People are dying and it's all our fault for using those damn devices! The devil herself's spawn, I tell you! 2. Is the video effective in conveying its intended message? If you don't feel like reading this analysis, then no, it does not. The creator of this video must be a boomer. By that, I mean boomers (or ignorant older people who refuse to educate themselves and stick to archaic ideals) tend to overlook real prejudices in society and make a big hoot over young people and their damn phones. When giving thought to real problems in our society (the current political climate inflaming discrimination against people of color, rampant student loans forcing college graduates to live out their lives in their parents' basements because most of their ...

Climbing Face Response 2

I was fooled by the first image! I really thought the man on the string was an artistic choice.  I I were to record this image in detail, I would say that this is a close-up image of a girl. This girl is expressionless, but whatever angle you look at her, she is staring directly at you. This image has more of a natural tone, and there is no color that necessarily pops out. Her skin looks quite coarse and uneven, and her lips are greatly chapped or dry. She may have some makeup on. I feel as if this is a closeup of her face on purpose, to make the viewer pay attention to the detail that lies within and subsequently become uncomfortable. If she was standing in the distance, there would be no detail and this feeling of personal space being violated wouldn’t be there. However, if this was just a closeup of her eye, I would just see an eye because that has been done many times before. For some reason, people really like drawing and photographing eyes. There is something off about h...